![]() ![]() I stopped using silkypix around 7pro but on 9 the basics are the same.ĭodge en burn is more subtle then HDR. The more you use it, the easier it is to reject those evil subscriber based programs and be eclecticly cheapskatish! No more auto pay to Adobe! Shadows and Blacks are submenus of the Tone menu.or something like that. ![]() The specific sliders for what you need are under the Exposure sub menu IIRC (I dont have it in front of me). If you have a G9, pay the $37 USD for SP9 Pro for Panny. I enjoyed walking/trekking in jungles and birding instead of waiting for birds in hides or near feeders.Īny thoughts, advises or comments are most appreciated. ![]() Initially, I thought I may just go JPEG in camera but burnt out and blacken picture happen very often with the ever changing environment. I learned editing by myself and am wondering if I missed finding such features in Silkypix. But with Silkypix, I do not find such features. LR's Highlight, Shadow, White and Black functions serve me very well to reduce the back lighting and brighten the bird up. I have downloaded both Silkypix Developer Studio 8 SE and Silkypix Developer Studio 4.4 SE.Īs my main interest is birds, at least 70% of my Raw files will have strong back lighting. As my photography interest are only for hobby and now retired, I am reluctant to upgrade to the latest LR. But with the newer G9, LR 5.7 does not support RW2 files. My old Canon Raw files I use LR 5.7 for processing. So, you can shoot raw and edit however way you like as you would do in Darktable or Lightroom.Just jumped from Canon 2 months ago to G9. I like to shoot sunstars, where you really need to be able to underexpose and pull up the shadows in post.Īgain, all the Silkypix version has all the original actual film Simulations by Fuji, and they are supported by Fuji. I´ve basically stopped shooting / developing color shots from raw, but take the jpegs and use raw files only for black and white (with Affinity and Luminar). This article I found seems to explain what I mean to say. I had frustration with free version as well. Give me the Nikon or Canon one, but with Fuji color presets. It´s the worst free raw developer I know and I wouldn´t dream of paying anything for a "commercial" version as long as they don´t fix it. And that is directly confirmed by Fujifilm australia. What I mean is, Silkypix Developer Studio Film Simulations are same as FUJI SOOC film Simulations. Silkypix has the Fuji film Simulations in the color tab. Either I have to take jpegs sooc or for raw files I need to use Affinity and Luminar, thus losing the Fuji color presets. Ps, that info was confirmed to me directly By Nikon Australia and Silkypix Japan. To me, logically speaking, if the camera from a country is that good, it's logical to think that, so is the software is as good. And first to get updates form all the Japanese camera manufacturers. They are the only company Natively understand the Fuji, Nikon, Panasonic raw. UI is designed by Nikon because it's made for Nikon. Is it really based on Silkypix? The UI is totally different. Because, only other tool than can achieve this is Curves.Īnd Nikon´s raw developer - which I really like - actually offers this functionality. It's lot accurate.Īlso, The way these sliders work is as such: Dodge HDR: instead of doing a global shadow recovery, it attacks the darkest part first. With HDR, you just have to fine tune your Curve adjustment. Usually curves gives the best Contrast control. And If you use Curves, then you actually do not need sliders. The studio and studio Pro version has it. Instead there is something like HDR and stuff, but they give different results than simple sliders. I´ve tried to work with it, but couldn´t find the two essential sliders for shadows and highlights every other editor seems to have. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |